Faith that distinguishes itself as liberal or progressive need not be regarded in the vast religious ocean as “less filling” or “more tepid”. In actuality, it can elicit a great deal of spiritual fulfillment.  Making a conscious, committed, and personal choice to live and address the issues confronting ourselves, our communities, and our world takes great fortitude.  There are no easy answer to the complexities and challenges that bombard us daily and we must remain diligent and awake in a host of ways to effectively engage.

Gary Dorrien, an Episcopal Priest and American theologian, characterizes liberal theology in this way: “From the beginning, liberal theology was a third way.  It was not radical, agnostic, or atheist, though it was routinely called all of these; liberal theology was both a morally humanistic alternative to Protestant orthodoxy and a religious alternative to rationalistic atheism”. 

Liberal theology is based on the premise that religiousness should be understood and interpreted from the perspective of modern knowledge and modern life experience.  In other words, members of a liberal faith are committed to making religion intellectually credible and socially relevant. Theirs is a belief that a working religion is not one that is separate from the modern world in all its brokenness, but one that firmly links their religious life to the present.

It is certainly true, and uncomfortable for some, that definitions of divinity can vary widely in an atmosphere of modern inquiry and perennially changing and growing perspectives.  Yet Sharon Welch, a popular Unitarian Universalist ethicist emphasizes divinity, not as a shorthand for a particular quality of the universe, but as a “quality of relationships, lives, events, and natural processes…that provide orientation, focus, and guidance for our lives.” This definition can hold a spectrum of frameworks for who or what God is and an unending supply of what gives meaning.

Spirituality in this sense is deeply tied to a personal and direct communion with the Other, the Divine.  Living the sometimes messy work of relationships as a vital part of one’s faith leads to another primary tenet of modern faith, a focus on moral ethics.  Ethics and social justice are natural outcrops of those who are concerned with this world. Salvation is about healing in the here and now and not focused solely on an eternal paradise in a yet unseen afterlife.  `

Modern faiths do place a high value on the autonomous authority of individual experience and reason, but that doesn’t mean (like some more conservative folks conclude) that not having a dogma means you think that you are your own god. It’s rather what David Tracy, a Catholic theologian, relates: “Liberals are those members of a church or religious sect who hold opinions ‘broader’ or more ‘advanced’ than those in accordance with its commonly accepted standards of orthodoxy.”  Of course, I would like to believe that progressive views are “more advanced” but I know that it is not always necessarily true.  What I do believe to be true is that liberals may hold strong opinions, but they rarely think they, or anyone else, have the whole or final truth.

Galileo, paid the highest price for his discovery of a scientific truth and Rene Descartes, known as “The Father of Modern Philosophy” (1596-1650) questioned every aspect of what is true.  Both men opened the flood gates of reason, giving “license” to the testing of scientists and those skeptical of external authority. Instead of a prescriptive belief system causing them to feel adrift in the religious sea, the liberal mindset is one of seeking and searching and working towards a more hospitable planet.    

Religion at its best helps us to find meaning and orientation in life.  Sallie McFague, a theologian with a passion for environmental issues, revels it thus: “Thinking theologically is not an end in itself; it is for the purpose of right action, for discipleship…theology is therefore essential, even though it is not the central enterprise of the “religious” life.  The goal of theology, as I see it, is to be functional, that is, to actually work in someone’s life.  It is meant to be an aid to right living.  There are two criteria it has to make sense and it has to make a difference.



  1. Dear Katherine,

    It is an interesting insight, these postings about the internal issues of Christianity and its denominations. What strikes me most interesting (to me at least) is your observation that “What I do believe to be true is that liberals may hold strong opinions, but they rarely think they, or anyone else, have the whole or final truth.”

    Often, we complain that liberals (or as I would call them, people with brains. Hehehehe) fail to make their voice heard in the public forum. But they fail to understand that the liberals are often humbled by life, prefer moderation instead of exaggerated platitudes and are happier with thoughtful approach instead of antagonistic challenges. “Be happy”, “Be patient”, “Be tolerant”, simply do not stoke the fire of the protestors nor make a good scoop for the media.

    There are many ideas lumped into the category of liberalism and progressives, and I too disagree with some of their conclusions, although I may agree with their essential ethos.

    It is a difficult path, the path of moderation. A middle way between the things which we passionately believe in, and accepting that we too are imperfect and an opposing opinion deserves to be heard – however inane or vile it may appear to us.

    Good luck, Katherine in your own journey through the middle way. I guarantee you it isn’t easy, but I believe you are well-educated on this point already!

    Yet I do believe, with all of my heart, that it is still the best way.

    On that encouraging note, I wish you a great Saturday!

    Pax Taufiqa.

    • Hi Taufiq, Fridays are so good, aren’t they?? Thank you for this thoughtful and of course, I believe 🙂 to be insightful take on moderates and liberals. I saw a bumper stickers yesterday that made me aware yet again of a less “shoving your opinions down someone’s throat” approach may be at our peril, it said: “Never underestimate what a bunch of stupid people in a big group can do.” Funny and true.

      Also, liked your recent post about Ali: his response reminds me of Jesus who said, “If someone strikes you, give them the other cheek”….When Ali replied, “When you spit on my face, I felt my anger rise up like the flaming ash of a volcano. And had I struck you then, I would have been motivated by my anger, and not by my love for God and His Prophet. I would have done a great wrong.”

      As always, good stuff, a peaceful weekend to you, I am going to Paris to visit my daughter who I haven’t seen since August and I can’t wait!!! Blessings, Nun Tuck

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s